Rating Scales
In each case, your examiners will score you on eight performance ratings:
- Data Acquisition: Collecting critical patient information.
- Problem Solving: Using critical information to manage patients.
- Patient Management: Making appropriate treatment decisions.
- Resource Utilization: Using the resources at your disposal to care for patients.
- Health Care Provided (Outcome): The actual outcome of the patient's health after receiving your care.
- Interpersonal Relations and Communication Skills: Clearly communicating with your patient, family, and medical staff.
- Comprehension of Pathophysiology: Understanding the case from a medical science standpoint, rather than memorized routine.
- Clinical Competence (Overall): How well you handled the types of conditions or problems presented in the case.
Detailed Performance Criteria
Examiners assign a score from 1 to 8 on each rating scale using the following general guidelines:
- Very Acceptable (7,8): The candidate confidently and correctly collected data and gave a diagnosis, managed patients with current and accepted techniques, and showed anticipation of and concern for the psychological, sociological, and economic patient needs.
- Acceptable (5,6): There were several minor inefficiencies or errors in the case management. Candidate showed an underlying working knowledge for safe medical practice. The patient had adequate care without significant, unnecessary pain, or life-threatening procedures or medications.
- Unacceptable (3,4): One or more critical actions were not taken, or dangerous actions were taken. Health care may have been incomplete, unorganized, or generally unsatisfactory. The candidate demonstrated partially inadequate knowledge of the pathophysiology of the problem.
- Very Unacceptable (1,2): Candidate was unable to proceed beyond routine data acquisition and management because he or she lacked knowledge of the presented pathology. Gross negligence or gross mismanagement was observed, and the candidate was without self-awareness of his or her own inadequacies.
Additional scoring criteria or indications of good, bad, or neutral behavior are provided to the examiner, but the final score is at the discretion of each individual examiner. Earning a score of 5 or above is not an indication of success or failure on a case or the Oral Exam. For more information on the passing score, please refer to “Passing Scores” below. Sample scoring sheets are available here:
Sample Single Case Score Sheet
Structured Interview
Structured interviews are scored as 25 points spread across eight stages of a typical patient interaction. Cases may focus more or less heavily in one of the eight areas.
1. History
2. Physical Exam
3. Differential Diagnosis
4. Testing
5. Treatment
6. Final Diagnosis
7. Disposition
8. Transitions of Care
Examiners will score a candidate's answers to questions related to each stage.
Sample Standard Interview Score Sheet
How ABEM Determines a Passing Score
ABEM does not use quotas or passing percentages to determine a passing score. A representative sample of examiners recommend the passing score in a process known as standard setting. Candidate performance is compared to the Board's performance expectations using ABEM's KSAs. The final passing score was approved by the Board. The entire scoring process is fully and independently replicated. As such, ABEM does not provide a hand score or rescore service since in the interests of fairness to all test takers, it has already been performed.
December 2021 Oral Certification Exam Scoring FAQs
Understanding Standard Setting